Try the political quiz

278 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

How might a day in your life look if all your leisure activities were government-approved?

 @9KJ4DQR from California answered…2mos2MO

This country is a Capitalist hell-hole that prioritises profit over people. The best thing our country has been able to do is use propaganda and convince other nations that "the american dream" is real and that the United States is the best country. It's not. Our citizens have been convinced to accept that what we have in place is the best way to operate a country, when statistically, it's proven wrong. If life in the United States was meant to serve the people, we would not have the highest infant mortality rate out of all developed nations. We would be able to walk down the streets without being afraid of possibly being raped or killed. This society is not okay.

 @9KK98DJRepublican from Washington disagreed…2mos2MO

We don't understand how good we have it here, we have the highest dollar per-capita here where even some of the poorer people have it better than most people in other countys. Also we have freedom of speech and press so we can say our minds without the fear of disaearing like in communist countrys. We have many comoditys like starbucks and some of the best colleges in the world, if you thought we have it really bad here try living in rual mexico where the cartells live and there is a feafr your dauther will disppare into the sex trade and possibly killed.

 @9KJ9FB9 from Washington disagreed…2mos2MO

anyone is capable of attain anything they want if they work hard enoiugh no matter where they come from

 @9KJ53Z9 from North Carolina disagreed…2mos2MO

No government is perfect. There are many very real problems in America that are heard about throughout the world. For example, Dobbs V. Jackson struck the United States and surrounding countries. The problems in our country are not kept secret.

 @9KJ4X8B from Kentucky answered…2mos2MO

I think they should have little say and let people do what they want but at least have laws over them so they don't commit any crimes

 @9KJ2M4SLibertarian from California answered…2mos2MO

I think that the government should have little say in this area and people should not be given a privilege to enjoy life.

 @9KJ3R57 from Illinois answered…2mos2MO

I think that the government should have little say in this area and people should not be given a privilege to enjoy life.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

How would your friendships and social circles change if government policies influenced where and how you socialize?

 @9KHVZKRIndependent  from North Carolina answered…2mos2MO

I feel it depends on the circumstances. If it was by political parties, I would be upset because I am friends with both parties.

 @9KHSF3S from Missouri answered…2mos2MO

I would be friends with more left leaning people however, I currently don't dictate my political perspective with who I associate with.

 @9KHS58P from Iowa answered…2mos2MO

 @9KHRPV8Peace and Freedom from Missouri answered…2mos2MO

According to enthusiasts the concept of global civil society is spreading rapidly and becoming pivotal to the reconfiguring of the statist paradigm. However, critics have recently grown more numerous and outspoken in opposition to the term claiming that it is actually perpetuating statism by grafting the idea of civil society onto the global by way of an unhelpful domestic analogy.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would you react if all news and media were filtered by the government for 'national unity'?

 @9L38YTD from New Jersey answered…2mos2MO

I would be annoyed because it would be not freedom of press with media being filtered it has a higher rate of being bias.

 @9L62SBGagreed…2mos2MO

If the government filtered the media then it would be super biased and nowhere near the right to freedom of speech or freedom of the press.

 @9L399F4 from Kentucky answered…2mos2MO

I think that it is a restrictions on constitutional rights and human rights

 @9L398TVIndependent from Virginia answered…2mos2MO

I'd be pretty mad. Every American shall have the right to speak their truth.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How might the pursuit of happiness change in a society where the state guarantees all your needs?

 @9L38BR8 from Texas answered…2mos2MO

It would be a lot easier but a lot less people would want to work and not work as hard.

 @9L3H8Z3 from Texas agreed…2mos2MO

From the perspective of the person with all needs granted, they will reach for higher goals out of their reach, possibly committing crimes to do so.

 @9L38JF3Republican from Florida answered…2mos2MO

People will have less motivation and determination to work for things like income and other important things. There will also be less competition in business, which causes and economic decline.

 @9L38HHR from Indiana answered…2mos2MO

It might limit opportunities, because the state does not have as many resources as the federal government. It would also limit the candidates for opportunities, because it would be limited to the people in that state.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

In a state-controlled society, how would you uphold your personal values?

 @9L39GWX from Washington answered…2mos2MO

 @9L38ZPZ from New Jersey answered…2mos2MO

concentration of economic controls and planning in the hands of a highly centralized government often extending to government ownership of industry.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

What challenges or benefits can arise from government control over social media algorithms?

 @9JQLFPL from Pennsylvania answered…3mos3MO

it could be used as a tool to impact people/ voters opinions, they may fall for false news and be impacted by media

 @9JQPDCMSocialist from Texas agreed…3mos3MO

Social media is one of the ways to inform the public to be used in such a way of control will subpress other viws.

 @9JQL3P9 from California answered…3mos3MO

Government control over social media algorithms could increase how protected our information is online.

 @9JQKXMP from Minnesota answered…3mos3MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How do you think varying levels of government intervention can impact the fight against climate change?

 @9HGLFG6 from Tennessee answered…5mos5MO

It could possibly give us more hope or less hope to a future where climate change doesn't happen.

 @9HGLKPN from Arizona answered…5mos5MO

I think there’s too many different opinions and laws happening here to come together as one when leaving it up to the states alone, as we’ve seen with the overturning of Roe v Wade.

 @9HGLPDNRepublican from Virginia answered…5mos5MO

each should be responsible for their area local for the counties, state for the whole state, and federal for the whole u.s. and terratories

 @9HGLBQH from Texas answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How would you feel if the state had the power to censor media and information to maintain social order?

 @9H8T5PC from Arkansas answered…6mos6MO

I feel like the states should not have the power to censor media and I feel like that would be infringing on my First Amendment right

 @9H8TDTB from Texas answered…6mos6MO

 @9H8TMTY from Arkansas answered…6mos6MO

 @9H8TPJ3 from Delaware answered…6mos6MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

To what extent should governments prioritize environmental protection over economic growth, and why?

 @9HTXXMHIndependent from Missouri answered…4mos4MO

I feel like economic growth is more important, so that way we can get into a place where we can have the funds for finding better environmental advances.

 @9D7RPXM  from New Jersey answered…4mos4MO

The government should prioritise environmental protection over economic growth so far as to ensure the future stability of the US' environment and to preserve its beauty.

 @9HT3KG2 from Utah commented…4mos4MO

We need the planet to be able to even protect the economic growth. SO i think we should defiantly focus on the environmental protection.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Can a government ever be too powerful, and where would you draw the line between helpful intervention and intrusive control?

 @9H8X96M from California answered…6mos6MO

Yes, governments should not be allowed to intrude upon the private lives and choices of private citizens.

 @9H8XTV6 from California answered…6mos6MO

Yes a government can be to powerful sometimes that will lead to a huge downfall because they are usually always wrong

 @9H8WXQL from California answered…6mos6MO

Yes they can be to powerful and the line would be once people start disbeliefing and crossing the line

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...