Reduced. Quantity based on number of votes. Transparency enhanced.
@ISIDEWITH5yrs
Yes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive
@ISIDEWITH5yrs
No, funding should come from their members
@ISIDEWITH5yrs
Yes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money
@ISIDEWITH5yrs
Yes, but only if all political parties receive the same amount
@ISIDEWITH5yrs
Yes, but the amount they currently receive should be reduced
No, and there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money
No, and political parties should be abolished
If the Prime Minister, Senator, or House of Commons member chooses to privately support a party using their own money, then I don’t care.
No stance on this issue.
Yes only for parties that are in the diet
there shouldnt be election
Only if that money was used in an election, which also saw the end of all private donations during the said election.
Reduced current amount. Make it proportional to the number of votes received. Transparency should be enhanced.
Decrease funding, make it proportional to the number of votes received, and mandate enhaced transparency.
No, and political campaigns should be publicly funded
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...