Try the political quiz

275 Replies

@9LLSB3NFree Democratic Partyfrom Maine  answered…2yrs

Reduced. Quantity based on number of votes. Transparency enhanced.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…5yrs

Yes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…5yrs

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…5yrs

Yes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…5yrs

Yes, but only if all political parties receive the same amount

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…5yrs

Yes, but the amount they currently receive should be reduced

@B37C5GTModerate Partyfrom New York  answered…3mos

No, and there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money

@B2PXRCXRhinocerosfrom Maine  answered…3mos

@9Z5XSL3Libertarianfrom Pennsylvania  answered…6mos

If the Prime Minister, Senator, or House of Commons member chooses to privately support a party using their own money, then I don’t care.

@9QWVP8YLeft Front from California answered…2yrs

Only if that money was used in an election, which also saw the end of all private donations during the said election.

@9LLSB3NFree Democratic Partyfrom Maine  answered…2yrs

Reduced current amount. Make it proportional to the number of votes received. Transparency should be enhanced.

@9LLSB3NFree Democratic Partyfrom Maine  answered…2yrs

Decrease funding, make it proportional to the number of votes received, and mandate enhaced transparency.

@9GBPM6DChristian Democratic Unionfrom Arizona  answered…2yrs

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...