No, it is a violation of our privacy.
Yes, but only if they suspect some one or a group of people of acts of crime.
I get that this is a privacy thing which we should have the right to… and it’s creepy and stereotypical that they would listen in. But I really don’t care because I don’t have nothing to hide… can’t say the same for criminals and terrorists
No, only with a warrant and probable cause
No. What someone does is not your business unless it's danger talk. I think you could monitor only if your reported for a period of time
Yes, but only for those with violent criminal backgrounds.
Yes, only if the person is a criminal or suspected terrorist.
Only when its needed as court evidence
yes to track important stuff but only with permission
Yes, only for those with serious criminal histories, suspects of crimes, or suspects of terrorism.
yes and only use in certain cases as in helping find murderers or stop other crimes from happening, Then after delete the calls and other
no but exceptions for Brad <3
Yes, but only for a court order and if it's necessary to combat terrorism
No, after the immigration crisis
Be allowed only after obtaining a warrant to do so on individuals or companies based on suspected criminal activity or other illegal activiities
Yes and No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
No, end all government surveillance
it should only be monitored when allowed. "karens" may be harder,but that's just my opinion
On a smaller scale because there still should be privacy
Yes , but only if they’ve gotten intel on suspicious activity dealing with the person whims phone call they are tapping into
Yes but only if they have a warrant
No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity
Yes, only when it is necessary, and not in a way that targets Arabs
@ISIDEWITH9yrs
Yes, but only by court order
@ISIDEWITH9yrs
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
@ISIDEWITH9yrs
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
@ISIDEWITH9yrs
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
Yes, but only people with long criminal and/or terrorist backgrounds
No, Only if there is a investigation of a group or person
Only when someone is considered a potential threat with irrefutable evidence
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
