Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @nicatim13 from Utah answered…41mins41m

No, but provide benefits to those that do include green spaces.

 @9MQ6LQY from Maryland answered…46mins46m

Yes but also make major changes to the shelter system.

 @9MQ6KZG from Washington answered…46mins46m

Only if they can't physically make the house payment because of an disability, age, or emergency.

 @9MQ3BJM from Colorado answered…3hrs3H

No, but more public investment should be put into these considerations

 @9MPXVH2 from North Carolina answered…4hrs4H

No but create more social programs, give a warning ticket that has all this info on it and (i hate to say it) but they s…

 @9MPX6ZBfrom Maine  answered…4hrs4H

This should be an option in case-by-case scenarios but not the norm.

 @9MPX6ZBfrom Maine  answered…4hrs4H

Increased mental health facilities, basic necessities, condoms, transition houses, yes. But no legal injection sites or…

 @9MPX6ZBfrom Maine  answered…4hrs4H

Not direct subsidies, but lower down payment percentage requirements without charging penalties

 @9MPPJNJ answered…5hrs5H

these should be Independent Catholic voluntary charity programs

 @9MPNYMJ from Illinois answered…6hrs6H

Yes, but only after a careful audit of the homeowner's financial transactions.

 @9MPNY33 from California answered…6hrs6H

No, local governments should allow more housing to be built instead.

 @9MPNVFC from North Carolina answered…6hrs6H

Not subsidies but incentives in the form of favorable (liberal) zoning rules and building codes that allow greater housi…

 @9MPFVFPfrom Guam  answered…7hrs7H

only for low income families, or people planning to start a family

 @9MPFVFPfrom Guam  answered…7hrs7H

if landlords is renting out property which is purchased from the government, the government can implement rent control p…

 @9MPBT2H from Minnesota answered…8hrs8H

Recommended but not required but in high denser areas like Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, New York, etc. I could see…

 @9MP88JH from Pennsylvania answered…8hrs8H

Housing developments in general should stop being created, and construction money should be focused toward making more a…

 @9MP6K53 from Massachusetts answered…9hrs9H

No, and welfare decisions should be increasingly left for state governments to decide

 @9MP2VM5 from Texas answered…9hrs9H

If the landlord charges you over 600 rent a month, and you come to find out somethings wrong with the house and the land…

 @9MP2TMC from Pennsylvania answered…9hrs9H

I think it depends we should make a spot they can go to if they don't want to live under shelter don't think they should…

 @9MNYC2G from North Carolina answered…10hrs10H

No, the government should generally restrict investors and companies from buying residential properties regardless of or…

 @9MNXSYZ from Texas answered…10hrs10H

if they have been offered a free place to stay, such as a shelter, and choose not too for invalid reasons, then yes, but…

 @9MNXBTZ from Texas answered…10hrs10H

They should not be on public property because they should not be sleep/living outside. There should be more shelters .

 @9MNSQ55 from Texas answered…11hrs11H

Rent should be determined and placed at a fair market value

 @9MNRKQB from North Carolina answered…12hrs12H

It depends on how much the community can spend, if its a low income area I think that would be a little unfair.

 @9MNRDML from Colorado answered…12hrs12H

no, but it there does seem to have an unfair advantage for the landies then i’d say it’s fair to take it up on court